An interesting point of view about the NGOization of African imagery fed to America
Written by duckrabbithas been posted by Paul Melcher on the Black Star Rising blog. You can read the full post here. duckrabbit doesn’t entirely agree with him. I think its actually a bit of a cliche that NGO’s only show pictures of despair coming out of Africa. Actually I think a lot of what they show is sanitized. Adam Westbrook got it spot on when he said that what the audience really wants is balance, not a drip diet of misery, or cynical and self congratulatory communications.
Here’s an excerpt from Paul’s post.
More and more of the documentary photography we see these days comes from NGOs, rather than the editorial press.
Rich people give money to NGOs, which then hire photographers to document their work. And because these organizations operate in the poor, war- and disease-stricken areas of Africa, that is what we see from NGOs. As international photojournalism from the editorial press continues to dwindle, NGO photojournalism may soon be all we see of Africa.
Just imagine what your perception of the United States would be if all you saw were images of 9/11, Katrina, crime-plagued ghettos and nothing else. Would you ever consider coming here for a vacation?
A Perverse Playground
Africa, or at least its despair, has become a perverse playground for too many photojournalists. It’s become a place to earn your merit badge as a documentary photographer. And so we get the same photo essays and multimedia presentations repeated over and over again, to the saturation point.
Interestingly, however, most of these merit-badge projects can only be found online today. Magazines won’t publish them even if they are technically brilliant; the editors, like their readers, are fed up — bored.
Author — duckrabbit
duckrabbit is a production company formed by radio producer/journalist Benjamin Chesterton and photographer David White. We specialize in digital storytelling.
Discussion (2 Comments)
Does that make the net the dumping ground for pointless creative output?
Unfortunately, there is a lot of truth to this. But editors are also to blame. They like to cycle cliches because they think cliches sell. They want AIDS, sick people in black and white photography to take away the colorful fabric, ravage, ridiculous acts by politicians and rebels, etc …
The NGOs are to blame as well. They want money to pay their own salaries. They want to cycle misery but sanitized misery, with some hope, so it won’t turn off the potential donor.
There are some journalists who focus on abuse that needs to be pointed out, but also the vibrancy that exists. I think some people can find these and see through the others, but many people are sadly victims of the recycled money making media and NGO machine, and some photographers are like vultures however way they see themselves.