First I read how so many Greenpeace execs were or have left to be major CEOs in so many environmentally destructive corporations of the first magnitude… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oInl21livMY
And now this. Too many pairs of rose tinted glasses.
I indeed understand that advocacy is the aim of this charity, though 5.1mil spent on salaries sounds like a campaign bigger than it seems to be. Then again I’ll admit to not knowing how big it really is…
Discussion (3 Comments)
Might that be because as charity its function is not to hand over money but to carry out advocacy?
First I read how so many Greenpeace execs were or have left to be major CEOs in so many environmentally destructive corporations of the first magnitude… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oInl21livMY
And now this. Too many pairs of rose tinted glasses.
I indeed understand that advocacy is the aim of this charity, though 5.1mil spent on salaries sounds like a campaign bigger than it seems to be. Then again I’ll admit to not knowing how big it really is…