Fabienne Cherisma: Visual ForensicsWritten by John Macpherson
Duckrabbit posted a link to an original article by Pete Brook a couple of years ago, in which he (Pete) investigated and analysed the chronology of the image-making of the body of Fabienne Cherisma, fatally shot in Haiti by a policemen in the aftermath of the earthquake.
I’m taking the liberty of linking to Duck’s original post in light of Pete Brook’s current post about Colors magazine’s publication of the disturbing images of Fabienne: ‘COLORS magazine Over-simplifies the Story of Fabienne Cherisma and Disaster Photojournalism.’
“I was surprised to make the discovery of those images of Fabienne within the pages of COLORS. More than that, I was bothered. Why was I perturbed? I don’t own the images and I certainly don’t own the story. I’ve not been wronged.
In short, the problem for me is COLORS treatment. They could not have researched the piece without being aware of my 15-part series. COLORS doesn’t deal with the issue in any depth. In fact, they rely on the images to drive the segment and then raise the question of ethics without really providing their own position. Of the images Nathan Weber’s image of the photographers surrounding Fabienne’s body is printed larger and with prominence. Are we incited by the image? Has COLORS forfeited a nuanced handling the images, and thus the story?
I guess, at heart, I am protective of the story. There’s so many sides to the coverage of Fabienne’s death that I don’t like to see it reduced to an over-simplified “it-was-wrong/it-was-what-it-is” argument. COLORS barely takes us past that.
Finally, I am bothered by COLORS‘ passive use of an abbreviated Weber quote that describes the circulation of the many images of Fabienne thusly:
“Even though grouping together is common for photographers in dangerous situations, many in the international photojournalist community were unhappy with having “their laundry aired in public.”
Prison Photography was the root and the source for the extended debate about these pictures. I brought the issue to the international community. All the feedback that I received for my digging and analysis was, without exception, positive. Readers were thankful to have had the scene looked at from the multiple angles, appreciated my interviews with the photographers, and understood more deeply the complexity of the situation.”
All of us consumers and creators of images would do well to reprise Pete’s careful and detailed analysis of the matter, and the conclusions he draws, but crucially conclusions that in no way seek to denigrate the photographers concerned. Thoughtful analysis such as this is something we need more of, not less, in my humble opinion, given that we are all ‘citizen journalists’ now. Fabienne Cherisma, and others like her whose unfortunate demise becomes the subject of ‘iconic’ image-making, deserve no less.