Another photo competition…..
Written by John Macpherson
© CIWEM
…but this time one that shows how it should be done, and can be done. It’s the Atkins/CIWEM ‘Enviromental Photographer of the Year’ competition.
Why is it good?
It’s free to enter.
There are real prizes – of proper spendable money!
They credit you when they use your work.
Their attention to detail is such that they even fully credit the numerous photographers whose work is used in the image montages on the banner ads on their web pages. Seriously! You need to have a look at it on this page for an example of how to properly thank your contributing photographers.
And, joy, you don’t hand over all rights in your work in perpetuity, and what rights you do grant are for reproduction and use only in connection with the competition, and only by the organizers and sponsors (and by the press, with credits), as detailed in the Terms & Conditions of entry.
-
By entering the Competition, you grant CIWEM a non-exclusive licence to reproduce, publish and communicate your entry to the public by exhibiting your entry through all media throughout the world in relation to the Environmental Photographer of the Year. This includes, but is not limited to: the judging process; the exhibition and tour; inclusion in an Environmental Photographer of the Year Exhibition catalogue or book; online galleries; promotional, press and marketing materials associated with the Environmental Photographer of the Year; and associated merchandising. CIWEM is allowed to pass on any entry to online and print publications to be used either for editorial or image based promotion only in relation to the Environmental Photographer of the Year, with full credit given to the photographer.
And they’ve even detailed clearly what is and is not allowed regarding ‘image manipulation’ with a well written guide (at page bottom) to keep you on the straight and narrow. NO ambiguity there then.
It’s refreshing to see a company that recognizes, and values, creative content, and the people who generate it.
And….the entry subject areas are important too: your socially and/or environmentally conscious work might find an appreciative audience through support of the competition.
For the record: I have no connection with this event whatsoever – I simply wanted to flag up good stuff for a change.
All you other rights-grabbing, duplicitous and avaricious so-called ‘competition’ organizers take note – this is how it should be done.
Discussion (2 Comments)
Thanks for that, John. As you say, the Real Deal (with apologies to Evander Holyfield).
Aye Tony – good to see someone taking it seriously and doing it right.